For some of you, the headline will get your hackles up. Before you throw me into the flaming pit of #cancelculture, hear me out. You owe it to yourself.

Photo by Pixabay on

Today I found myself in two separate interactions on Twitter and Facebook. The topic, you guessed it, was polyamory: the practice of having multiple sexual partners. Because the idea of a healthy monogamous relationship is soooooo antiquated, right?

The mentioned Twitter interaction was a mere exchange of positions. No debate took place, despite the responder’s request for comment. I wasn’t interested in starting an argument on Twitter, where literally hundreds of people can get involved. The responder claimed that humans are capable of loving more than one person romantically.

I, of course, don’t agree with this notion.

The Facebook interaction, on the other hand, went on for quite a bit. I opined that the LGBT community should not go out of their way to endorse polyamory/gamy, should that situation ever arise.

Obviously, I have no issue with LGBTs. However, there’s a tiny minority in the midst pushing for pedophilia-acceptance and to lower the age of consent, making it easier for adults to (legally) prey on minors.

To the LGBT Community’s credit, the vast majority doesn’t condone this push, and I applaud that. You may ask why I’m mentioning the community in relation to polyamory.

Since Stonewall, the LGBT Community has been pushing for societal acceptance of deviations from sexual and marital norms (as I pointed out in the Facebook status above).

If polyamory becomes the topic being discussed at the national dinner table, it’s likely the LGBTs will swoop in and support those who want multiple sexual partners without anyone looking the other way.

I stated that polyamory should not be rendered illegal in the eyes of the law. Doing so is pointless. You can’t legislate morality.

The Prohibitionists in the early 1900s had a great cause with even greater intentions. People observed the societal effect of consuming alcohol with reckless abandon. They also witnessed and experienced the needless imprisonments and deaths the beverage caused.

Photo by Chris F on

Unfortunately, the movement didn’t take human nature into account. If people are scummy, they will stay scummy. More laws embolden criminals. Al Capone would’ve been a no-name street thug if Prohibition never happened.

I’m getting off-topic, forgive me. When there’s an opportunity to give a history/civics lesson, I can’t resist!

Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on

As I was saying, polyamory should not be illegal (for practical reasons). It should also, however, not be socially acceptable. We gag at the idea of sharing our significant other with someone else, as we should.

The mere thought of our girlfriends/boyfriends exchanging bodily fluids with someone else and coming back home to get in our bed?

Yes, that is disgusting.

Sleeping around diminishes the idea of love and commitment. Making love with your “true” romantic partner won’t mean anything anymore. To you, they’re just another face. Another notch in your bedpost. Nothing distinguishes them from the others you’re copulating. That special someone is not special anymore.

Once you reach that stage, what’s the point of maintaining a relationship? What’s the quality that makes it special? Sure, you can enjoy their company and have hour-long conversations with them, like you can with anybody else. But what’s the one variable that sets the relationship apart?


Photo by Pixabay on

You may ask, “Why is it so important to maintain monogamy?”

As of right now, it’s bad enough that 42% of all divorce cases were the result of extramarital sexual contact. In the same APA study linked above, 80% of marriages involving secret infidelity ended in divorce. Revealed infidelity had a more modest 43%.

Noninfidelity marriages had a rate of only 23%.

Do we really want to push and encourage polyamory among today’s populace? Imagine what the divorce rates would look like in the future if we did.

(“Okay, but who cares? It’s just divorce…”)

In the scenario where the couple bears children, no…it’s not “just divorce”. To the child, you’re turning their whole life upside down.

Photo by Pixabay on

Children growing up in divorce are more likely to develop anxiety and depression. It also becomes harder for the lone parent to discipline their child properly. Discipline/conditioning requires consistency. A lone parent already has too much on their plate: working, paying bills, getting errands done, etc. And NOW they have to enforce discipline?!

Children growing up in divorce/fatherless also account for nearly 90% of teenage runaways, 63% of adolescent suicides, and 70% of juvenile delinquets.

This is a topic that’s been studied extensively. There’s a wealth of research pointing to the negative effect divorce has on children. A simple Google search would verify this.

Our children deserve every advantage in life that we can afford them. Growing up surrounded by two monogamous parents is such an advantage.

(“Yeah, well…that’s just marriage. We’re talking about RELATIONSHIPS.”)

Yes, and what do marriages start off as? RELATIONSHIPS! Ding ding! A healthy relationship leads to a healthy marriage.

A healthy marriage leads to healthy children.

(“This is about our rights. Who cares about the children?”)

Buddy, let me stop you right there: if you disregard the welfare of children, i.e. our most vulnerable citizens…then I don’t know what to say to you.

Except this: Polyamory is Fucking Disgusting.

Thanks for reading! Be sure to leave a Like and Follow my Blog through either WordPress or Email!

8 thoughts on “Why Polyamory Is a Trashy, Disgusting Lifestyle

    1. It teaches the child that commitment doesn’t matter. It takes two committed adults to raise a strong, independent person. Suppose one “father” tells the child it’s okay to do something that the real father doesn’t agree with. Polyamory leads to inevitable chaos and disorder in the home. It’s a disgusting lifestyle and anyone who partakes in it should do some self-reflection.


      1. Who says commitment can’t be part of a polyamorous relationship? And just like any other, when parents disagree, they work it out. Sounds like jealousy might be your hang-up.


      2. It’s not so much jealousy as it’s an awareness of how the family unit works and why it matters to society. It takes 2 parents to optimally raise a child, not 5 or 10. Just because polyamory is a unique, revolutionary idea doesn’t make it intrinsically good.


      3. You just contradicted yourself. Your first sentence states societal acceptance, while your second indicates shunning? And there is no relationship between adultery and polyamory. Your pail doesn’t hold water.


      4. Pay attention. Shunning someone for doing something is a *lack* of societal acceptance. I’m arguing *against* societal acceptance of polyamory. There most certainly is a connection between adultery and polyamory: it’s having multiple sexual partners.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s